The Best Place to Work When You Die – Google

funeral flowers

Researching another topic, I was surprised to come across the super generous benefits Google pays to an employee’s family when that worker dies. Every year for the next 10 years the employee’s spouse or partner will receive half of that worker’s salary. The average yearly income at Google is $141,000. This means the deceased employee’s spouse/partner will be given an average of $700,000.

In addition, each child of that employee will be paid $1000 a month until their nineteenth birthday – or their twenty third birthday if they’re still in school. So any child going to college could receive roughly $275,000. The spouse of an average Google employee with two young children could easily be given a million dollars from the company.

I suppose I shouldn’t have been surprised at Google’s generosity. This is after all a company that leaves others in the dust when it comes to employee maternity and paternity leave. New mothers can take 18 weeks of paid leave after giving birth.  And fathers can enjoy their new baby with six weeks of paid leave.

So it appears that Google has their employees covered at both the momentous times of birth and death. Small wonder so many job seekers dream of walking Google’s Mountain View campus.

 

More on the Work Life:

Five Sensible Reasons for Eating Bugs

Stripe Caterpillar

Photo Credit: Madmaven

Put aside the ick factor and consider this: for many people around the world, eating insects is neither strange, disgusting nor exotic. Bugs are their food, their meals, what they and their ancestors have been eating for ages. Why?

Number one – the buggers are packed with powerful nutrition. Comparing iron content, beef has  6 mg per 100 grams of dry weight and Mopane caterpillars have an astounding 31 mg of iron per100 grams. Traditionally eaten in southern Africa, these plump caterpillars are also an excellent source of  potassium, sodium, calcium, phosphorous, magnesium, zinc, manganese and copper, according to a report by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Number two: at least five million children a year die because their meager diets contain so little protein and calories. According to Frank Franklin, director of pediatric nutrition at the University of Alabama, a protein processed substance from edible insects could offer a less expensive solution to Plumpy/Nut, a peanut based food given around the world to children suffering from malnutrition.

Number three: What’s more friendly to our environment: Bugs or the vertebrates Westerners prefer?  Which take up less space? Which emit far less pollutant gases? No contest. Bugs win hands down.

Number four: As world population expands, land and resources needed to sustain cattle and pig production will only shrink. How will all those new hungry mouths be fed? It seems plausible that new sources of protein for a steadily increasing population will have to be found.

Number five is the health factor. Cattle and pigs measure high in saturated fat content. Bugs do not. Which means if people eat more bugs than livestock, they will suffer less heart disease and fewer premature deaths.

Giving up their hamburger and steaks won’t be easy for Westerners. But some are already entering this new bug eating terrain. In Montreal students from McGill University are in the process of creating a protein-rich flour made from insects. They’re starting with grasshoppers. Hm…Grasshopper bread anyone?

More Food Morsels:

Dutch Tulip Mania Began with a Virus

Semper Augustus Tulip

Semper Augustus Tulip

Contrary to popular thought, tulips didn’t originate in the Netherlands. They arrived as gifts from the Sultan of Turkey just as the Netherlands, enriched by its hugely profitable East Indies trade, was embarking on its Golden Age. Eager to show off their wealth, merchants built estates with luxurious  gardens that showcased this dazzling new flower – the tulip. And not just any old plain Jane yellow or white tulips. No. THE tulips to grandly display were the exotic, flamboyant, two colored variety. White with dazzling flames of richest reds, pinks and purples, they were prized for both their beauty and rarity.

Expensive to begin with, they were given exalted names such as “Admiral of Admirals” and “Alexander the Great” and quickly began to sky rocket in price. At the height of Tulip Mania in the Spring of 1637, some coveted single tulip buds were selling for more than 10 times the annual income of skilled tradesmen.

As it turns out the unique, striated beauty of these tulips was caused by a virus. Known as Mosaic Virus, this non-lethal virus broke tulip colors into two or more hues.

The peak of the tulip mania bubble came during the winter of 1636-37. In what had become a wild tulip futures market, some bulbs were changing hands over ten times a day. But no deliveries were ever made to fulfill those contracts. In February, stunned speculators across the Netherlands watched the tulip market collapse. Buyers had shriveled up and disappeared, taking with them dead pipe dreams of getting rich on sick flowers.

 

 More on Investing and Business: 

Why Do Vegetarians Have Lower Blood Pressure?

Tomatoes, asparagus

What’s known for sure is that vegetarians DO have lower blood pressure than meat eaters. Numerous studies have conclusively shown this, including most recently a report in Journal of the American Medical Association: Internal Medicine by Dr. Neal Barnard of Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM). He and his colleagues based their conclusions on at least 7 controlled trials and 32 observational studies.

As early as 2006, inspired by research that showed “individuals who consume a vegetarian diet have markedly lower blood pressures than do non-vegetarians,” the National Institute of Health recommended that we eat diets rich in fruits, vegetables, nuts and beans.

The question, however, of exactly WHY and HOW vegetarian diets keep blood pressure lower than diets with meat is still open. According to Dr. Barnard, “Many people will say it’s because a plant-based diet is rich in potassium. That seems to lower blood pressure. However, I think there’s a more important factor: viscosity, how thick your blood is.”

The World Health Organization has already linked saturated fat to viscous blood and a risk for high blood pressure. With that in mind, Barnard goes on to paint a very unpretty picture of  bacon grease hardening in a frying pan as it cools and actually solidifying. Comparing this to what’s happening in our own bodies, he adds, “Animal fat in your bloodstream has the same effect. If you’re eating animal fat, your blood is actually thicker and has a hard time circulating. So the heart has to push harder to get the blood to flow. If you’re not eating meat, your blood viscosity drops and your blood pressure drops. We think that’s the more important reason.”

Sure sounds logical to me.

On the subject of heavy Thanksgiving turkey meals that send stupefied diners to sleepy-land, Barnard says, “People say it’s the tryptophan in the turkey, but it’s not. It’s all the gravy and the grease that’s entered their bloodstream. It reduces the amount of oxygen that’s getting to their brain and they just fall asleep.”

Oh my. I myself have been eating less and less meat for numerous reasons. Add Dr. Barnard’s opinions to these reasons and the vegetarian path looks smarter all the time.

 

Related stories:

Are Stomach Balloons in Your Weight-Loss Future?

weight-loss pillRecently launched in the UK and already used throughout Europe, new weight loss pills that inflate into stomach balloons are now in the investigational stage in the US.

Here’s how they work. A patient swallows a large pill attached to a long catheter. Inside the pill is a balloon that’s inflated once the pill arrives in the stomach. Taking up space about the size of an apple, the balloon causes the patient to feel fuller when eating. In theory the patient will then eat less. Up to three balloons can bob around in a stomach at one time. After three months of hopefully consuming less food and losing weight, the patient has the balloons removed in what is called an “endoscopy procedure.” A thin tube is threaded down the anesthetized patient’s throat to the stomach. This time around the balloons are deflated and pulled back up and out.

The procedure pioneered by Obalon costs about $3,300.

Reservations come from fitness expert Tim Bean and JAMES HAMBLIN, the writer who wrote the Atlantic piece. They share the opinion the balloons could in  fact actually enlarge stomachs.

My own reservations start with an aversion to swallowing hefty-size pills and judging from the company’s own illustrations, pictured here, this is a REALLY hefty-size pill. NEXT, imagine the sensation of that attached plastic catheter slithering down your throat into your esophagus, then into your stomach. Whew!

Now, onto the pills and balloon themselves. Where are they made? How are they made? Assuming all is ship shape, the journey between their manufacture, travel and placement seems like a long, complex one so it would be hard not to consider the possibility of   errant bacteria somewhere along the way.

And how about the body’s own rejection system? Bodies don’t like foreign objects setting up housekeeping inside their exclusive domain. I would guess that’s why the balloons are only allowed a three month’s stomach residency.

In theory the balloons freely float above stomach contents and cause no difficulties. So far there’s nothing to disprove this. But the procedure is still quite new.  Nevertheless, in a country where treating obesity means big bucks for doctors in that specialty and the obese themselves are hungry for any fix that PHYSICALLY prevents them from eating all they want, it’s probably only a matter of time before balloons are bobbing about in America’s rotund stomachs.

More on the Weight-Loss Front:

The US Trails 20 European Countries in Healthy Eating

Produce Market

To be more precise, people in 19 European countries, along with Australia, eat healthier foods than Americans. For anyone who has traveled in Europe, this is not a surprise. Grown for taste – not hardiness or long distance travel –  luscious fresh fruit and vegetables are enjoyed everywhere and just about every western European meal is plain old yummy.

Making it official, however, A new fact-driven report comparing America’s food system to 125 other countries, has just  been published by non-profit, advocacy group, Oxfam, based in Oxford, England. Analyzing data from World Health Organization, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N. and the International Labor Organization, Oxfam measured  families access to fresh produce and nutritional proteins, the affordability of these nutrients compared to less healthful options and and how their diets impacted the country’s overall health. Using these measurements, Oxfam was able to rank the best and worst places to eat around the world.

The Number one country with easy access to healthy, affordable foods was the Netherlands. France and Switzerland shared the number two spot. The worst countries for finding healthy diets were Yemen, Madagascar, Ethiopia, Angola and Chad.

The Us did even worse in the health category. Only five other countries had higher rates of diabetes and obesity than the US. Our poor showing is linked to poverty. Although food is very cheap here in comparison to other countries, poor Americans don’t have affordable access to fresh vegetables and fruits for a balanced diet. Cheap foods centered on fast, processed, packaged foods do not a healthful diet make.

The overall global picture of the report shows that one in eight people go to bed hungry every night, even though there is sufficient food to feed them all. How is this possible? Oxfam’s report chalks it up to overconsumption, misuse of resources and waste, along with the new practice of diverting food from human consumption into biofuels.

Max Lawson, Oxfam’s Head of Advocacy and Public Policy said, “Basically, if you arrive from Mars and design a food system, you probably couldn’t design a worse one than what we have today on Earth. There is enough food overall in the world to feed everyone. But 900 million people still don’t have enough to eat, and 1 billion people are obese. It’s a crazy situation.”

Indeed.

 

More on US Food:

Older Posts